[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Name spaces in programming languages
|
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Name spaces in programming languages |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:13:21 +0200 |
Nope. In Guile, there is no such thing as a globally shared
mutable name space: each module has its own set of bindings.
In Guile, that is _one_ implementation of a million. I could list a
slew of Lisps that have a global namespace, all quite different.
You'd only be able to mention the RxRS variants. ;)
(oh, and I consider Scheme broken in many regards, but that is for
another thread)
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, (continued)
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Message not available
- Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27