[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another question about self-paging
From: |
Paavo Parkkinen |
Subject: |
Re: Another question about self-paging |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:10:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, 31.10.2005 at 09:31 -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 13:29 +0200, Paavo Parkkinen wrote:
> > On Sun, 30.10.2005 at 16:55 -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > > There is a meta-level problem with self-paging. It is predicated on the
> > > assumption that one application should be informed about pressures
> > > resulting from the behavior of other applications.
> >
> > Why is this a problem?
>
> Because any story about security begins with the goal that for any two
> process A and B, it should be possible to prevent communication from A
> to B. If B is asked to reduce its working set in response to an action
> by A, then communication has occurred.
I understand this completely. I just don't see how a demand to page
out a page is communication from a process A to a process B. To me it
seems like communicating about the state of the system to a process A.
Is this also forbidden? Why?
Paavo
--
kremlin kanavien soppaa
Re: Another question about self-paging, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/30
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging,
Paavo Parkkinen <=
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31