[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for CC, please
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: No need for CC, please |
Date: |
Fri, 12 May 2006 08:14:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Hi,
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:10:08PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:33:12PM +0200, address@hidden
> wrote:
> > > ... which of course won't work for the direct copies you get, as
> > > they don't have any List-* headers.
> >
> > Again, when using the list-reply function, mutt looks *at the
> > addresses*, not at any List- headers. (That's precisely why you have
> > to configure "lists" by hand.)
>
> No. If no configured list addresses are found in the header, mutt
> does indeed follow List-* headers when doing list reply.
Well, it doesn't for me -- I usually just get an error message saying
"no lists found" in such a case.
Maybe it is a configuration option, or maybe many lists don't actually
send List-* headers... So I guess you are right, but that's really
beside my point :-)
-antrik-
- Re: No need for CC, please, (continued)
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Marco Gerards, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03