l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Part 2: System Structure


From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: Part 2: System Structure
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:39:16 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Tue, 23 May 2006 16:09:43 -0400,
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I do not know enough about HIPAA (or similar laws) to say much about this, 
> > but
> > you seem to be changing positions all the time.  First it needs DRM, then it
> > doesn't, and now it does again.
> 
> Actually, I have been consistent all along that it requires
> encapsulating constructors, and Marcus has been consistent in declaring
> that encapsulating constructors are DRM.

That's not how I understood you.  You said that it is "reasonable
diligence" that would force implementors to choose a DRM solution over
a non-DRM solution.  That however is a step of judgement, which
narrowly looks at protection, and not at other requirements (like
access).

Thanks,
Marcus






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]