Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GNU ethical repository criteria: Should privacy issues really be extra credit?

[anonymiss]

>Daniel Pocock:
>--snip--
this part:
> I think the FSF approach (ranking each provider) is a good step but it
> is not the complete solution.  The real solution needs to look at how
> to encourage free-software-minded sysadmins to volunteer time and
> energy to run things to the highest standard on the FSF criteria, not
> just for repository hosting, but for everything else, including email,
> SIP, XMPP, etc
> 
While I think this could be good for people who still think that it
matters that much where you have your email hosted, where you
participate in that other federation service (xmpp), you can't copy
those ethical repository criteria 1:1 to federation or client-server
based message systems.
(Leaving out all the facts which should tell people not to use those
technologies anymore and fade them out (as soon as we have easy enough
to use alternatives accessible for everyone),) I'm still curious how
your list for those technologies would look like.


-- 
--anonymiss

Email is public. Talk to me in private:
  http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/anonymiss/
  irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/anonymiss
  https://psyced.org:34443/anonymiss/

If you want Email-like conversation, use bitmessage:
  www(vcard): http://krosos.sdf.org/
  bitmessage: BM-2cSj8qEigE3CMaLU3CwPZf7T3LvzvnttsC