Re: where libltdl will be libtoolized

[Peter O'Gorman]

Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > To repeat myself: Okay to commit to HEAD?
>
>
> No ChangeLog.  What is this for exactly?  I think I have a
> half-baked patch for this myself if it is to fix libltdl hardcoding.

Sorry, I would have made a changelog before applying.

Would read something like this:
Do not require that libtoolize --ltdl=/some/path end in libltdl. Move
most libltdl headers to libtldl/libltdl to allow #include <libltdl/ltdl.h>
to always work.

Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com