Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,

Hallo Ralf!

> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:15:29PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > > > 2006-05-16  Albert Chin-A-Young  <address@hidden>
> > > > >
> > > > >         * tests/link-order.at: Take hardcode_direct and
> > > > >         hardcode_direct_static into consideration when testing
> > > > >         link order.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.  Applied both this change and the linked patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks.  Are you volunteering for the backport to branch-1-5 (which has
> > > a similar issue) or should I do it?
> >
> > Luckily, in my reply to your next email we've agreed that it doesn't
> > need a backport. ;-)
>
> Nope.  The test was broken before the new feature.  The test fix Albert
> suggested before implementing hardcode_direct_static needs a backport.
> It's just the new feature that doesn't.

Oh right... I hadn't noticed tests/linkorder.test in the branch-1-5
tree.  I'll do the backport.

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://trac.azazil.net/projects/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook