[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 11:35:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:17:54PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:11:46PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > >* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST:
> > >
> > >>The following patch addresses
> > >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I
> > >>added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if
> > >>hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This
> > >>impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX.
>
> > >This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi).
> >
> > I'll commit one presently.
>
> Thanks. It would be great if you could explain that "static library
> dependency" does _not_ have to do with static libraries at all -- what
> a confusing name IMHO! Maybe we should think of a better one. Is that
> what HP-UX is using in their documentation?
I couldn't find a name for this in the HP documentation so I made
something up :) However, the output of 'chatr' has 'static' in the
type of the DT_NEEDED line so that's where I came up with the name.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry, Albert Chin, 2006/05/17