[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
git? branch-2-2?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
git? branch-2-2? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:56:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hello libtoolers,
1) Can we move to use git now?
2) Can we create a branch-2-2 and cherry-pick bugfixes from HEAD
into it, aiming for a soonish 2.2.2 (let's say, in a few weeks;
already a few important issues are known)?
3) If yes and yes, do you agree with the proposed git policy:
master should usually not contain merges except for merges from public
topic branches, should we have such in the future. Generally, master
should be the first to receive a patch, and stable branches should
cherry-pick from master. In your local trees, you should rebase private
topic branches against the upstream tree before inclusion.
If you agree, I just might look into doing the work.
I'm a bit unsure whether 2.2.2 should come before the move to git.
Comments appreciated.
Thanks,
Ralf
- git? branch-2-2?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
Re: git? branch-2-2?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/04