[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git? branch-2-2?
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: git? branch-2-2? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:40:13 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> I think we should wait until we are reasonably sure that we won't need a
>> maintenance release for several weeks before cutting over to git. 2.2.2
>> in a few weeks is a worthy goal (2.1b and 2.2 were on the first of the
>> month, so April 1st seems like a good target), so lets use our resources
>> to make that happen before worrying about git.
>
> That's a plan!
I have just been reading the git documentation (the only thing I knew
how to do until today was 'git pull'), looks like I will make an error
or two for the first little while, but will be able to work on multiple
problems at once (I share Bob's problem of never having worked out a
system to do that with cvs).
The above plan works for me.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
- git? branch-2-2?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/04
- Re: git? branch-2-2?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/04
Re: git? branch-2-2?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/04
Re: git? branch-2-2?, Eric Blake, 2008/03/04