[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Small patch for the QNX platform
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Small patch for the QNX platform |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:04:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello Mike,
* Mike Gorchak wrote on Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:37:34PM CET:
> >> This patch adds qnx as platform which supports library version
> >> information.
>
> RW> As far as I can see, this patch changes the versioning scheme used on
> RW> QNX. This means, that potentially all libraries created with libtool
> RW> after this change are incompatible with all of those created before.
>
> No, it is not changes versioning scheme, it adds support for the
> versioning under QNX. I did not found any incompatibilities with already
> compiled and installed libraries.
Ah, ok. Thanks for this explanation.
> RW> I see you supplied the last QNX-related change to Libtool, too, in
> RW> 2004. Can you provide information about why this change is needed now?
> RW> Did QNX change their versioning, or why is this necessary now?
>
> The main problem why I added support for QNX is libdrm, which I porting
> to QNX right now, libdrm uses "-version-number 2:4:0", but libtool fails
> on the following check:
> # Check that each of the things are valid numbers.
> case $current in
>
> 0|[1-9]|[1-9][0-9]|[1-9][0-9][0-9]|[1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]|[1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])
> ;;
> *)
> func_error "CURRENT \`$current' must be a nonnegative integer"
> func_fatal_error "\`$vinfo' is not valid version information"
> ;;
> esac
> because $current is empty at this point. I will mark an error and my
> comments to the script below with >>>> sign.
> case $vinfo_number in
[...]
> case $version_type in
> darwin|linux|osf|windows|none)
[...]
>
>>>>> since QNX is not listed platform and $version_type contains
>>>>> "qnx", the variables $current, $age and $revision are not set and
>>>>> empty at
>>>>> this point. So this cause a problem with $current check for the
>>>>> non-negative number and non-digit characters.
> esac
> ;;
> no)
> current="$1"
> revision="$2"
> age="$3"
> ;;
> esac
Ah ha. Our testsuite needs to expose this issue. This is a good point
to add some test exposure to versioning. Patch coming up in another
mail. I would like you to try out that patch: after applying it, run
make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -k versioning'
and ensure that, without your change, the test fails, and with your
change, the test passes. If that is not the case, please show the
respective test output.
> RW> Also, we would be extremely interested in seeing testsuite (make -k
> RW> check) output of Libtool on this system.
>
> For the first bunch of tests (103) there are 3 was failed, but they
> are failed because of using gcc command line instead of QNX's QCC
> wrapper around GCC. QNX uses Dinkumware C++/STL library instead of
> using GNU stdc++, but g++ searching for the libstdc++ instead of
> dinkumware libcpp library. This problem could be easily solved by
> setting CC=qcc and CXX=QCC. But it was too late to specify qcc instead
> of gcc, because I'm using not fast computer for QNX development and
> almost of half tests has been completed when found this error, running
> all these tests took a lot of time. But if you need, I could re-run
> all test suite with QCC wrapper for C++ without any problem :) Log
> attached. Looks like there are few problems, which are not related to
> C++. I will check them.
Yes. Thanks for your testing. Please post the tests/testsuite.log file
for the testing that you have already done. Then please also
reconfigure (or, if you are using separate build trees, set up another
build tree) with qcc/QCC:
path/to/libtool/configure -C CC=qcc CXX=QCC
make
make -k check
and send verbose results for that, too, including log. For getting
verbose output for the old and the new testsuite, please see the README
file.
Thank you,
Ralf
- Small patch for the QNX platform, Mike Gorchak, 2009/01/23
- Re: Small patch for the QNX platform, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/23
- Re: Small patch for the QNX platform, Mike Gorchak, 2009/01/23
- Re: Small patch for the QNX platform, Mike Gorchak, 2009/01/23
- Message not available
- Re: versioning test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/26
- Re: versioning test, Mike Gorchak, 2009/01/27
- Re: versioning test, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/27
- Re: versioning test, Mike Gorchak, 2009/01/27