[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:24:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Argh. AC_LANG_PROGRAM does not produce a meaningful program for Java,
> as Autoconf has no decent Java support. Gah! And we test for RUNPATH
> using $OBJDUMP in each tag, GCJ last, so there it does not get set to
> yes, and shlibpath_overrides_runpath is not a tagged variable. What a
> mess.
>
> Let's try something simple before trying something ugly, namely, I would
> like to see how your system behaves if above bug were fixed. Please
> configure, then edit the generated libtool script like
> sed --in-place 's/\(shlibpath_overrides_runpath\)=.*/\1=yes/' libtool
>
> then run the new testsuite:
> make check-local
>
> and report results.
ah, magic! :)
now i only get expected failures (13, 30, and 59)
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, (continued)
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/19
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/20
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results,
Mike Frysinger <=