[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:13:08 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:49:26PM CET:
>> The dynamic linker checks are called for every tag, but produce no
>> tagged variables. I was going to propose something like the attached
>> patch at some point, but thought it best to wait 'til after 2.x is
>> released in case it broke something.... maybe should not have waited.
>
> How about if you apply the bit of your patch for _LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG
> only? That seems far safer, and in fact ok to me before 2.2, assuming
> no testsuite regressions.
Ok, I applied this.
Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
2008-02-20 Peter O'Gorman <address@hidden>
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG): Do not call the
_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER macro here.
Reported by Mike Frysinger <address@hidden>
Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/libtool/libtool/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.136
diff -u -r1.136 libtool.m4
--- libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 16 Feb 2008 03:46:06 -0000 1.136
+++ libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 20 Feb 2008 18:22:11 -0000
@@ -6832,7 +6832,6 @@
_LT_COMPILER_C_O($1)
_LT_COMPILER_FILE_LOCKS($1)
_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS($1)
- _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER($1)
_LT_LINKER_HARDCODE_LIBPATH($1)
_LT_CONFIG($1)
- Libtool 2.1b test results, (continued)
- Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/08
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/19
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results,
Peter O'Gorman <=
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/13