[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals patch
|
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
|
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals patch |
|
Date: |
Sun, 02 Dec 2001 17:27:50 +0100 |
> This is not true accourding to stone's book.
> On p. 55 (II pitch -> Accidentals -> E. Tied accidentals) this exact
> situation is handled - and according to Stone the accidental on the tied
> note (first note on the line) is enough - and the accidental doesn't
> need to be repeated on the 2nd note.
>
> Comments?
Sounds reasonable!
/Mats
- Re: Accidentals patch, Rune Zedeler, 2001/12/02
- Re: Accidentals patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2001/12/02
- Re: Accidentals patch,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: Accidentals patch, Mark Hindley, 2001/12/03
- Re: Accidentals patch, Rune Zedeler, 2001/12/03
- Re: Accidentals patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2001/12/03
- Re: Accidentals patch, Laura Conrad, 2001/12/03
- Re: Accidentals patch, Rune Zedeler, 2001/12/03
- Re: Accidentals patch, Laura Conrad, 2001/12/08
- Re: Accidentals patch, Rune Zedeler, 2001/12/08
- Re: Accidentals patch, Laura Conrad, 2001/12/08
- Re: Accidentals patch, Rune Zedeler, 2001/12/09
- Re: Accidentals patch, Rune Zedeler, 2001/12/03