[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: blot_diameter
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: blot_diameter |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 01:05:30 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> > For cutting, one could vary the pressure on the cutting tool to
> > produce lines that are thinner than blot_diameter; also it should be
> > possible to produce sharp outside corners for symbols that are cut
> > (bar lines, slurs, staff lines, beams).
> >
>
> Sounds reasonable. However, I think lily should attempt to do just fine
> engraving rather than purely mimicking the physical process of
> engraving/stamping/cutting: Even the finest (manually) engraved music may
True, but fine engraving doesn't have sharp corners. (why? because I
say so :-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- Re: blot_diameter, (continued)
- Re: blot_diameter, Rune Zedeler, 2002/02/01
- Re: blot_diameter, Juergen Reuter, 2002/02/05
- Re: blot_diameter, Rune Zedeler, 2002/02/05
- Re: blot_diameter, Juergen Reuter, 2002/02/06
- Re: blot_diameter, Juergen Reuter, 2002/02/06
- Re: blot_diameter, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/02/06
Re: blot_diameter, Juergen Reuter, 2002/02/04
Re: blot_diameter, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/02/01
Re: blot_diameter, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/02/01