Re: guile-gtk

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Andreas Rottmann writes:

> I've some talking with Rob Browning about that; I've taken over
> maintainership of G-Wrap and will release a 1.9.0 pretty soon
> now. I'll then package the new G-Wrap for Debian (which will coexist
> with the old g-wrap packages).

Great, this is very good news!

> I think after we have a G-Wrap 1.9.0 release, we can release tarballs
> of Guile-GNOME soonish.

> As soon as we have tarballs out (and g-wrap 1.9 is packaged), I can
> go ahead and work to close the now already long-standing ITP on
> guile-gobject.

And this!

> As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason;
> It used to work.

Ok.  We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS.

> I think testing and new code using the bindings would be nice. Other
> than that, I can't think of something ATM.

Ok, then I'll keep doing what I'm doing (which is just that).

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org