[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-)
From: |
Matthias Kilian |
Subject: |
Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:38:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2i |
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > - -$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > - (cd $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
> > + -$(INSTALL) -d $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > + (cd $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
>
> I don't get this. Why do you need it?
It's used during the OpenBSD fake installation -- they set up a
temporary installation hierarchy and make install with, for example,
DESTDIR=/usr/ports/print/lilypond/w-lilypond-2.4.5/fake-i386. This
temporary hierarchy is then used to make a binary package.
Without the patch, some file go to
/usr/ports/..../fake-i386/usr/ports/..../fake-i386, i.e. DESTDIR
seems to be allready contained in local-lilypond_datadir.
Mostly harmless, but maybe other packagers have similar problems.
Ciao,
Kili
- Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/07
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/07
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/03/07
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-),
Matthias Kilian <=
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/03/08
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/08
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/09
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/03/09
- Re: Suspicious path issues in Makefiles ;-), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/10
- More makefile oddities (was: Suspicious path issues...), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/11
- Re: More makefile oddities, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/03/11
- Re: More makefile oddities (was: Suspicious path issues...), Matthias Kilian, 2005/03/11
- Re: More makefile oddities, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/03/14