lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any "objective" praises?


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Any "objective" praises?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:39:39 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720)

Erik Sandberg wrote:
Hi,

I am looking for good comparisons between different typesetting
softwares' layout beautifulness.

Lots of people have praised the beautifulness of lily's output on our
various lists; it seems that everyone agrees that the (untweaked) output
of lily is far more beautiful than the (untweaked) output of any other
music typesetting program. However, our lists is a very biased source.

Does anyone know about a good third-party comparison of music notation
software, where lily is included, and where some general judgement of
beautifulness is included?

there aren't, and that's because beauty is subjective. If you want objective measure, then compare with hand-engraved scores. That's also what we do.

--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]