[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: implementation plan for music streams

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: implementation plan for music streams
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 21:37:06 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313)

Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20.46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I'd start with 4. because they're independent from the rest, and we can
readily test the rest of those.

The reason for my ordering, is that 3 can be used to verify that 4 works.

BTW, (1-3) are completely independent of (4), and I have just finished step (1) locally. If you insist on getting (4) done before (1), then that's perfectly OK with me; but is it OK for you to look at my patch for (1) while I do (4)? I guess (1) is the step which requires the longest discussion, so it might be good to start the discussion early.

If you have a working patch, let's see it.


Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden -

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]