|
From: | Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: | Re: implementation plan for music streams |
Date: | Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:51:56 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) |
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 20.42, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:I'd start with 4. because they're independent from the rest, and we can readily test the rest of those.I'm now reworking repeats. While I'm at it, I attempt to generally clean up the repeat code.
No, better not. In the interest in stability, we want to change as little as possible.
- Attempt to remove various repeat iterators: Let \repeat be more like a music function, which constructs a SequentialMusic containing the repeated musics.
What does this have to do with music streams? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |