[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] first-clef property
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] first-clef property |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:41:28 +0100 |
Le 7 févr. 08 à 02:49, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Since the incipit is a completely
different piece of notation (eg. whose spacing and beat counting
should not influence the main music), this should be implemented
similiar to the hack with a \score inside the instrument name.
I think the best approach is to figure out what the problems with that
approach are, and try to solve those.
Indeed, I've been convinced by Juergen, so that's what I'm trying to
do.
I have a question.
So far, I've written an incipit engraver, which behaves just like
the instrument name engraver, except for the first system where
the incipit may be printed with the instrument name. Should there
be an incipit engraver, specializing the instrument engraver (or
a common base class), or should I add this feature right into the
instrument name engraver?
I'm asking because the impact on the user is different:
- in the former case, one would have to use a function (eg \incipit)
to define the incipit + remove the instrument name engraver + add
the incipit engraver;
- in the later case, one just have to define the incipit with the
dedicated music function.
nicolas
- Re: Incipits, (continued)
- Re: Incipits, Karl Hammar, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Juergen Reuter, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Robert Memering, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Till Rettig, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Juergen Reuter, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Till Rettig, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Karl Hammar, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/02/11
- Re: [patch] first-clef property, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/02/06
- Re: [patch] first-clef property,
Nicolas Sceaux <=
- Re: [patch] first-clef property, Till Rettig, 2008/02/07
Re: [patch] first-clef property, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/02/02