Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical

[Patrick McCarty]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:14:03PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Mark Polesky <address@hidden>
> > To: Patrick McCarty <address@hidden>; Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> > Cc: lilypond-devel <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:08:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical
> > 
> > 
> > Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > IIUC, every grob is self-contained, so it shouldn't matter which order
> > > they are in.  Maybe in the past someone wanted to group "related"
> > > grobs together (like the internal grob property list), thus the
> > > comment.
> > > 
> > > Alphabetical order makes the most sense to me in this case, with the grob 
> > alist.
> 
> I prefer case-insensitive so X-offset and Y-offset are near
> the bottom (where I expect to find them). Let me know if
> you object.

Oops, I didn't read your email carefully enough.  :-)

The properties (except for "meta", as you noted) can be in any order.
I am okay with a case-insensitive ordering. 

BTW, it looks like the grob list is not completely alphabetized
(AmbitusAccidental follows AmbitusLine).

-Patrick