lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: membership for the issue tracker


From: Mark Polesky
Subject: Re: membership for the issue tracker
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)

Graham Percival wrote:
> - enhancement: something which requires new code.
> 
> - accepted: default status once added (by a member)
> - fixed: programmer thinks it's resolved
> - verified: Bug Meister checks the results in an official binary
>   and agrees it's resolved
> 
> - priority-high: lilypond crashes
> - priority-regression: it worked before
> - priority-medium: this is the highest priority for "normal" bugs.
>   No, we don't care if you have a comission due tomorrow, or it
>   looks like the output of microsoft word.
> - priority-low: if the Bug Meister thinks it isn't important,
>   and/or isn't likely to be fixed.  For example, anything touching
>   Ancient music automatically gets a priority-low, since nobody's
>   touched that code in the past four[1] years, and nobody will
>   probably touch it in the *next* four years.
> 
> [1] I might be using the definition of "four" which encompasses
> the numbers 3 or 2.  Whatever, it's been a long time in
> lilypond-years.  :)

Graham,

this is informative! Might as well cc this to CG 6.2 with a
heading like "TODO: clean this up."

Or not. You're the boss in that department...

Thanks, though.
- Mark



      




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]