[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:21:42 +0100 |
Kieren MacMillan wrote Saturday, July 25, 2009 6:30 PM
Thanks for the reference — for subsequent thread-followers, I also
recommend
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-spaced_sentences>
Indeed, I just see that @frenchspacing is only used for French
and
Japanese (the latter only partially). It should be activated for
all
languages except, perhaps, English. Note that I don't care what
you
native speakers actually decide for English
Excellent!
Then I nominate @frenchspacing (i.e., single-spaced sentences) be
used for the English docs, consistent with the overwhelming
majority of modern English typographic style guides and
practice...
Seconder? Opposed? Abstentions?
I've no problem with either one or two spaces
as a standard in the docs, but I tend to
automatically type two as I was raised on
monospaced mechanical typewriters and later
monospaced teletypes and screens. I still prefer
a monospaced font for email - I find it much easier
to read. It is customary to use two spaces at
the end of a sentence when using a monospaced font.
In fact it was the standard taught to professional
typists in England until word processors and
proportional fonts appeared.
Trevor
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, (continued)
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/07/25
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, David Kastrup, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, David Kastrup, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Graham Percival, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Graham Percival, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Graham Percival, 2009/07/26
- Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/26