[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme
|
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:41:11 -0300 |
'() is preferred, as it evaluates to a constant. (list) is a function
call, which might mean different things if you override the definition
of list.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Carl Sorensen<address@hidden> wrote:
> You code the empty list as (list). I typically code the empty list as '().
>
> It there a preference? I suspect that we ought to be consistent, although
> it's not highly important. It could be part of the code janitor work,
> though.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/19
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/25
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/26
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, David Kastrup, 2009/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, David Kastrup, 2009/08/30