[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:08:42 +0100 |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 1) I don't care what RMS says.
You know you do :)
> 2) We were *never* going to use a Stockhausen example in the lilypond
> docs anyway.
Certainly not. Even Debussy got banned from our docs, for GNU's sake!
> 3) This whole thread is stupid and pointless and stupid.
Yeah, but that's what gives our mailing lists this particular charming
je-ne-sais-quoi isn't it? :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Hans Aberg, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Graham Percival, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Arthur Reutenauer, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/24
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/02/24
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, David Kastrup, 2010/02/24
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/24
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/23