[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:45:38 -0600 |
On 4/27/10 1:44 AM, "Nicolas Sceaux" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Actually, a nice indentation would be:
>
> #(define-music-function (parser location args)
> (arg-type-predicates)
> body)
>
> or:
>
> #(define-music-function
> (parser location args)
> (arg-type-predicates)
> body)
>
I believe that this indentation scheme is more consistent with standard
Scheme indentation than the other. (parser location args) is at the same
list level as (arg-type-predicates) so it should have the same or higher
indentation, not lower.
I like this, and would be very satisfied with making it the standard.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., (continued)
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Nicolas Sceaux, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Mark Polesky, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/27