[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 May 2010 09:00:40 -0400 |
Hi Han-Wen,
> I take issue with the way you interact with me on the mailing-list,
> and I have had enough of it.
For the record, I am appalled at David's etiquette -- which is to say, complete
lack thereof -- and understand your reaction completely. While I appreciate and
(at a basic level) value every- and anyone's input into Lilypond, I certainly
value yours more than his, in no small part because of the bad spirit with
which his is constantly contributed.
There are undoubtedly others that feel the same way.
Just wanted to let you know -- and say it in this public forum -- so that you
don't feel unappreciated or unsupported against David's regular and unnecessary
negativity.
Best regards,
Kieren.
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), (continued)
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), dak, 2010/05/01
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), hanwenn, 2010/05/01
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), dak, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046),
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Ousting bad people (was: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)), David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people (was: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)), Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people, David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/03
- our development mess, Graham Percival, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people, David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/19
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/02
Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), dak, 2010/05/03