[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 17:41:52 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090817)

Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:19:52AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on
input files would be good.  I think bar checks are at
least as important as a \version statement, which is
mentioned there.
I think a better place would be in a new @subsection at the
top of 2.1 "Single staff notation", just before 2.1.1
"Accidentals and key signatures".  Here's my proposed text:

Eh?!  You think this is more important than accidentals, ties, and
In a way I do, since anybody will keep reading until they find the information about accidentals, ties and articulation, when they need them, whereas very few will realize that it is highly relevant to keep reading into a section on "bar checks", which is a concept that doesn't really make much sense until you have read more about it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]