[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045)
From: |
n . puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045) |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:49:50 +0000 |
Hi Joe,
I haven't been able to replicate the problems I had running `make
check', even with the hash table default set to 1000; I guess that means
LGTM. :)
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/10001/11001
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/10001/11001#newcode849
lily/axis-group-interface.cc:849: "rest-pure-height-cache "
move below pure-relevant-spanners
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/show
- Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), lemzwerg, 2010/07/14
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/15
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), joeneeman, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), joeneeman, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/23
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045),
n . puttock <=
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), arnonokia6230, 2010/07/31
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/31