[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3 |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:19:44 -0700 (PDT) |
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Huh. I've been following the Arch Linux development list
> for a while, but it didn't occur to me that they were
> doing something radically different than the recommended
> policy.
>
> This is the procedure they are following, and I think they
> are nearly finished with the task:
>
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Python_Todo_List
Their advice is pretty clear (quoted from above link):
Packages pointing at python binary
(lilypond appears in this list)
Packages which have "/usr/bin/python" or "/usr/bin/env
python" in their files and will need to change to python2 if
not already compatible with python-3.x. Note that some of
these are fixed by just building against a python2 binary,
while others require some sed magic...
- Mark
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Benjamin Peterson, 2010/10/17
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Benjamin Peterson, 2010/10/17
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/17
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/18
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, John Mandereau, 2010/10/18
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/18
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, John Mandereau, 2010/10/19
- Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/19
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/18