Re: Potential fix for issue 37

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

[cc: lilypond-devel]

This looks great, I don't see a regression test file; are you
adding that please?

Jan

Mike Solomon schreef op vr 07-01-2011 om 20:54 [-0500]:
> Kinda meh, but it gets the job done!  I've included three patches,
> including the original.
> The second preserves the flat beams but gets rid of the crashing lily,
> whereas the third implements some bendiness.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> MS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 
> > 2011/1/7 <address@hidden>
> >         I'm not exactly sure what the desired output would be for
> >         issue 37, but my code assumes that if there are collision
> >         problems, flat beams look best.
> >         
> >         Lemme know what you think!
> > 
> > 
> > Judging by my very own personal taste i'd say that when notes are
> > not on the same staffline it would look better if the beams were
> > slanted; i'd also prefer slightly smaller vertical gap between upper
> > beams and noteheads (now it's something like 1 staff space, i'd go
> > for 0.5 staff space). And it would be great if beams covered
> > stafflines like in regular situations.
> > But this is my personal opinion and of course the new output is far
> > better than the old one, so keep up the good work!
> > 
> > 
> > cheers,
> > Janek
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel