[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: developers on Windows [7]
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: developers on Windows [7] |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2011 13:29:21 +0000 |
Eluze,
)-----Original Message-----
)From: address@hidden
)[mailto:address@hidden On
)Behalf Of eluze
)Sent: 27 May 2011 13:37
)To: address@hidden; Phil Holmes
)Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7]
)
)Am 27.05.2011, 14:20 Uhr, schrieb Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
)
)> ----- Original Message ----- From: "-Eluze" <address@hidden>
)> To: <address@hidden>
)> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:49 PM
)> Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7]
)>
)>
)>>
)>>
)>> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
)>>>
)>>>
)>>> I could use some help from a developer who can do some testing on
)>>> Windows 7 (64 bit?) SP1.
)>>>
)>>> See this bug:
)>>>
)>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1562
)>>>
)>>> I'm trying to get this one nailed, and am getting a lot of help, but
)>>> it's still very clumsy for a Windows noob like me, without access to
)>>> such a problematic machine.
)>>>
)>> i just had the opportunity to run this program on a machine with
)>> windows 7 starter (32-bit) - tried both 2.13.53 and 2.13.61 and had
)>> no error at all.
)>>
)>> hope this information is of use.
)>>
)>> cheers Eluze
)>
)>
)> Have you installed SP1?
)>
)> --
)> Phil Holmes
)>
)>
[James' reply:] can you try to compile the *exact* example in the tracker item
(assuming you haven't done that)?
If it still works it might be some quirk of Windows Starter Edition. I have
access to the other versions but not this one - this is OEM by the looks of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions
James
test.ly
Description: test.ly
- developers on Windows [7], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/05/26
- Re: developers on Windows [7], -Eluze, 2011/05/27
- Re: developers on Windows [7], Phil Holmes, 2011/05/27
- Re: developers on Windows [7], eluze, 2011/05/27
- RE: developers on Windows [7],
James Lowe <=
- RE: developers on Windows [7], James Lowe, 2011/05/27
- RE: developers on Windows [7], -Eluze, 2011/05/27
- RE: developers on Windows [7], James Lowe, 2011/05/27
- Re: developers on Windows [7], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/05/27
- RE: developers on Windows [7], James Lowe, 2011/05/27
- Re: developers on Windows [7], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/05/27
- RE: developers on Windows [7], James Lowe, 2011/05/28
- RE: developers on Windows [7], -Eluze, 2011/05/27