[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doc writing for unpure-pure-containers

From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Doc writing for unpure-pure-containers
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:34:35 +0100

On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Peekay Ex wrote:

> Mike,
> On 14 November 2011 10:18, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> I've answered a couple questions recently where unpure-pure-containers have 
>> come in handy and think it'd be beneficial to have some text in the notation 
>> manual about them.  However, understanding pure properties is scary for 
>> developers, so I'd imagine that it'd be downright nightmarish for users.  
>> James - would you be interested in helping me out with this? I think that 
>> you're good at formulating things in a way that people understand.
> No problem, but before you start on the work, suggest a place where
> you think it should go.
> For example were you thinking

This seems appropriate.

> Or thereabouts?
> I ask because perhaps this kind of information may not be appropriate
> for the NR.

This seems less well suited, as the use of unpure-pure-closures is not really 
programming work but rather a tweak.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]