[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stable releases
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Stable releases |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:22:06 +0100 |
On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I'm open to hearing everybody's opinion. If we can get consensus it might
> be a powerful motivation for moving to 2.16.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
I think that the major deciding factor will be Guile 2.0 integration. If Ian
is confident that this cannot happen w/in the next couple months (by
"confident", I mean in light of his own work and work he may be able to farm
out to others), I think we should work to have a stable release out ASAP (all
my critical bug fixes are scheduled for pushing soon). Personally, I don't
have any plans to change anything major for the next few months - I've more or
less been coasting on bug fixes since the summer. I don't mind 0 critical
problems being a criteria, so long as the window of 0-ness lasts for a decent
chunk of time (i.e. 1 week).
Alternatively, if Ian sees the light at the end of the tunnel, then it's worth
making Guile 2.0 integration the main target of 2.16.
Cheers,
MS