[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:17:40 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 |
On 1/21/12 11:47 AM, "Marc Hohl" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> I must admit that I am lost here and do not quite understand what's
>>> going on,
>>> but will there be any difference between
>>>
>>> < c\3 e\2 g\1> and< c e g>\3\2\1
>>>
>>> once these changes are implemented?
>> The latter would not display anything anywhere.
>Great!
I'm not sure you actually will find it great (although I think it is more
consistent).
If we don't want to have string numbers show up in the music, but we need
them for the tabstaff, right now we can do
<c e g>\3\2\1
In the future, <c e g>\3\2\1 won't assign the string numbers to the
tabstaff. (And in fact, I can't find this usage documented in the NR).
Instead, as would be done regularly in lilypond, we would do
\once \override StringNumber #'stencil = ##f
<c\3 e\2 g\1>
This is consistent with how things are handled in lilypond, so I think we
ought to move in this direction.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: checking 2240, (continued)
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/22
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/01/21
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/21
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/01/21