[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:41:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 21.01.2012 18:44, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, "David Kastrup"<address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers
>>> appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_
>>> listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music
>>> iterator _does_ broadcast them instead of leaving them as articulations.
>> The tabstaff engraver team listens to *both* string number events *and*
>> articulations. Combining the two is a bit of a pain.
>>
>> That's why I asked earlier to get some consistency. If we can get string
>> number events to always be in articulations, we don't need to broadcast
>> string number events. If the rhythmic music iterator can make them always
>> show up as articulations, that would be great.
> I must admit that I am lost here and do not quite understand what's
> going on,
> but will there be any difference between
>
> < c\3 e\2 g\1 > and < c e g >\3\2\1
>
> once these changes are implemented?
The latter would not display anything anywhere.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: checking 2240, (continued)
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Graham Percival, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/22
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/01/21
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/21
Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/01/21