[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:06:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
>> On 14 April 2012 16:25, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:
>
> oops, that should be "we propose that we use these direction
> loops"
>
>> > for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
>> > { ... }
>> > for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
>> > { ... }
>>
>> Ok, I'll do so.
>
> Not yet. I just wanted to clarify what you were talking about,
> since most people don't have the time to go trawling through
> rietveld discussions. If something is difficult to understand,
> the first instinct is just to ignore the discussion.
Is this supposed to declare d itself or not?
--
David Kastrup
- for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/17
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, address@hidden, 2012/04/20