[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2012 09:02:01 +0200 (CEST) |
> There is a drawback, though. q is changed. Now q is implemented as
> <> but with the current duration on it. Which would mean that the
> total moment of
>
> { c4 <> q }
>
> would likely change when q gets expanded. While <c> _is_ considered
> for q for consistency's sake, perhaps <> should be made to leave it
> alone.
Sounds good.
Werner
Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06