[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 May 2012 09:21:13 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
>
> >In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
> >in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
>
> Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
+1
What about defining a
null
or
n
"note name"? Then we could write
c4 n\footnote
- Graham
Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06