[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:52:57 +0000 |
On 2014/10/11 17:53:13, Dan Eble wrote:
On 2014/10/09 05:13:48, dak wrote:
> Incidentally, do you use git cl
> for uploading? Your reviews are remarkable in that they do not
allow
> comparing/viewing the various versions of your uploads. That should
> not usually happen so it would be interesting to know what causes
this
> situation.
I have been using "git cl upload origin/master" with my branch checked
out.
What is responsible for determining the differences between uploaded
patch sets?
I'm not sure. One thing is likely that "my branch" has a certain
continuity in being related to the same issue (git cl records some info
in .git/config per-branch). What I usually do is to have my branches
associated with an upstream branch.
git branch -b issuexxx origin
when creating the branch would do that, as would an explicit
git branch --set-upstream=origin
I have no idea whether one of the two is definitely involved. But
keeping the same branch around is likely important. Renaming it is
fine: I do that frequently and it keeps the relation to the issue around
just fine.
https://codereview.appspot.com/152370043/
- Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), dak, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), dak, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2014/10/08
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), dak, 2014/10/09
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2014/10/11
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden),
dak <=
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2014/10/18
- Re: Issue 4156: Define Smob<> constructors. (issue 152370043 by address@hidden), dak, 2014/10/18