Re: Reduce size of PDF files when inc. in *TeX docs (issue 194090043 by address@hidden)

[pkx166h]

Thanks to all


https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/de/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/de/usage/running.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/de/usage/running.itely#newcode160
Documentation/de/usage/running.itely:160: pdftex-, xetex-, oder
luatex-Dokumente eingebettet werden;
On 2015/01/20 22:38:04, lemzwerg wrote:
> @w{pdftex-}, @w{xetex-},

Could someone translate the English version I have now done? Then I can
put it into the patch.

Else the German documentation will bear no resemblance to the English.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode185
Documentation/usage/running.itely:185: @code{PDF} files generated will
be much larger than normal (due to
On 2015/01/20 22:38:05, lemzwerg wrote:
> I think there is no reason to use @code{...} here.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode186
Documentation/usage/running.itely:186: little or no font optimization).
However, if two or more files are
On 2015/01/20 22:38:05, lemzwerg wrote:
> Please always use two spaces after a full stop.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode187
Documentation/usage/running.itely:187: to be included within
@address@hidden, @address@hidden or
On 2015/01/20 22:38:04, lemzwerg wrote:
> Ditto: no @code necessary, since you don't talk about the binary
itself but the
> respective program in general.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode189
Documentation/usage/running.itely:189: gostscript) resulting @code{PDF}
in @emph{significantly} smaller files.
On 2015/01/20 22:38:05, lemzwerg wrote:
> s/gostscript/ghostscript.  And somehow the whole sentence seems to be
mangled...

OK yes, I guess I had been looking at this too long. I've reworded bits
of this again, see if makes more sense now.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/lily/general-scheme.cc
File lily/general-scheme.cc (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/lily/general-scheme.cc#newcode307
lily/general-scheme.cc:307: "Return true if the command line includes
the --bigpdf parameter."
On 2015/01/20 22:38:05, lemzwerg wrote:
> @option{--bigpdf}

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/lily/main.cc
File lily/main.cc (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/40001/lily/main.cc#newcode161
lily/main.cc:161: {0, "bigpdfs", 'b', _i("generate big pdf files")},
On 2015/01/20 22:38:05, lemzwerg wrote:
> s/pdf/PDF/

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/