[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: small print
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: small print |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 07:26:27 +0000 |
On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 09:12:29 Maurizio Tomasi wrote:
> > On 4 Jul 2002, Simon Bailey wrote:
> >
> > > something i have seen quite often in orchestral pieces is that
> other
> > > voices are sometimes printed in small print during rests of a
> certain
> > > instrument.
> >
> > Just so that you know, these are called "cues".
> >
> > --
> > Danny.
>
> After taking a look at the image Simon put on the web, I am not sure
> these
> are real "cue" notes. Their purpose should be to give the player an
> hint
> about what the other instruments are playing at the moment, while a
> real
> "cue note" is something the player him/herself has to play.
No, ``cue'' means someone else is playing it. Small staves are
sometimes
used for one staff in a duet score where a part is provided, and for
ossias.
Is there a problem with making different sizes of staves available
within a staffgroup? Small notes are used for harmonics too, in
addition to diamond shaped notes. I thought ossias were done already,
but I don't find ``ossia'' in the index.
Why does the misspelling of ``staves'' as ``staffs'' persist? Because
of
native English speakers who don't spell very well.
------------------------------------------------------------
Information is not knowledge. Belief is not truth.
Indoctrination is not teaching. Tradition is not evidence.
David Raleigh Arnold address@hidden
- small print, Simon Bailey, 2002/07/04
- Re: small print, Danny, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Maurizio Tomasi, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print,
David Raleigh Arnold <=
- Re: small print, Maurizio Tomasi, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Han-Wen, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Simon Bailey, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Han-Wen, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Simon Bailey, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Rune Zedeler, 2002/07/05
- Re: small print, Simon Bailey, 2002/07/05
Re: small print, Simon Bailey, 2002/07/05