[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constructive criticism
From: |
Nick Busigin |
Subject: |
Re: constructive criticism |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:18:32 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> The step from basic to advanced user is clearly a major threshold but
> does not involve learning all about Scheme but rather to learn the
> mechanisms to set properties and the syntax used. The sections on
> "Setting Variables" and "Fine Tuning layout" in the Tutorial try
> to explain these aspects.
> I also sketched a slightly more elaborate instruction in an email
> some months ago, thinking that it might a good addition to the manual
> but haven't yet received any response on if it is useful or not.
> See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-10/msg00195.html
Hello Mats,
Thank you for posting your link and also for writing out your "What You
Need to Know About Property Settings" document. After reading the
manual, I was still a little unclear of how it all fit together. Your
document concisely summarized what I needed to know. Now I have a much
better idea of how to go about making tweaks and I also have a better
(although still at a novice level) insight into how lilypond works. I'd
definitely vote to have your document either included in the manual or
perhaps have a pointer from the manual to it.
A comment about the documentation - it's really quite complete, just
quite a bit to swallow when you are initially getting up to speed on how
to use lily. However, the more I learn about lily, the more I
appreciate how complete and well written it is.
Nick
==============------- www.SongBirdofSwing.com -------==================
Nick Busigin address@hidden
Visit Our Indie Jazz CD Construction Project!
==============------- www.SongBirdofSwing.com -------==================
- Re: constructive criticism, (continued)
- Re: constructive criticism, Nick Busigin, 2004/01/07
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/10
- Re: emacs editing, was constructive criticism, Paul Scott, 2004/01/10
- Re: constructive criticism, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/01/10
- Re: constructive criticism, Ferenc Wagner, 2004/01/07
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Ferenc Wagner, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism,
Nick Busigin <=
- property syntax (was Re: constructive criticism), John Williams, 2004/01/09
- property syntax (was Re: constructive criticism), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/10
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- was constructive criticism now tremolo revisited, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- was constructive criticism now tremolo revisited, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08