[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
missing dots with merge-differently-dotted
From: |
Matthias Kilian |
Subject: |
missing dots with merge-differently-dotted |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:13:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Hi,
rather new to LilyPond and keen to experiment, I started to write
Busonis famous piano transcription of Bachs chaconne in d minor from bwv
1004. Using the printout of Breitkopf & Härtel, I'm currently stuck on
the following:
\version "2.1.15"
\score {
\notes \relative c' {
\property Staff.NoteCollision \set #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t
\time 3/4
\key d \minor
f8 g16 a << {bes,8 d g d'16 cis d8 f,} \\ {s8 d4. ~ d4} >>
<< {e16 f g bes} \\ e,4 >> a16 g f e
}
\paper {}
}
The point is that both d's in the first beat are perfectly merged,
but that the dot from the dotted quarter (stem-down voice, d4.) is
missing. [The Breitkopf edition has a dot after the quarter d.]
Is there a way to get the d4. dot while still merging that dotted
quarter's head with the beamed 8ght?
Ciao,
Kili
ps: I hope this isn't an FAQ. I'm rather new to LilyPond; however,
a search for `merge-differently-dotted' in the list archive won't hit
any mail with a similar problem.
pps: it seems that dots are printed if the *shorter* note is dotted. At
least. the example of Bach's cello suite, beat 1, has a dot after the
merged notes.
- missing dots with merge-differently-dotted,
Matthias Kilian <=