[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Evolutionary User Strategery
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Evolutionary User Strategery |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:55:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Saturday 08 July 2006 18:58, Fairchild wrote:
> The 3.0 processor could note the 2.4 version flag and treat the ly file in
> the 2.4 way, maintaining upward compatibility without a need for
> convert-ly.
In what way would that be different from installing two different versions of
lily? If you don't want the bugfixes from 3.0, why do you upgrade to 3.0?
--
Erik
- Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/07
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/07
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Trevor Bača, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/07/08
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery,
Erik Sandberg <=
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/09
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/10
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/10
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Simon Dahlbacka, 2006/07/10
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/10
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/10
- Message not available
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/12