[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Evolutionary User Strategery
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Evolutionary User Strategery |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:11:39 +0100 |
On 7/9/06, Fairchild <address@hidden> wrote:
New scores could use new features and not have to work around the bugs of
earlier versions. Older scores that have been carefully tuned, compensating
for earlier bugs, would continue to produce the intended result without
having to be overhauled. There would be no need to maintain multiple
versions.
This basically implies that all old versions of lily must be included
in the new versions, so e.g. lilypond 2.10 will contain both version
2.10, 2.8, 2.6 and 2.4. Which means that the lilypond package grows by
a factor 4. I think a better solution would be that you create a
script locally, which parses the input ly file, reads the \version
statement, and picks which lilypond version to use to compile your ly
file.
Erik
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, (continued)
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Trevor Bača, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/07/08
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/09
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/09
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery,
Erik Sandberg <=
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/10
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Simon Dahlbacka, 2006/07/10
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/10
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/10
- Message not available
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/12
Re: Evolutionary User Strategy - A Compromise, Colin Wilding, 2006/07/12