[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Contemporary music documentation
From: |
Joseph Wakeling |
Subject: |
Re: Contemporary music documentation |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:36:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> Those "actual contemporary scores" must be placed in the public
> domain, licensed under Creative Commons, or licensed under the GNU
> FDL. If you're thinking about an exerpt of Shostakovich or Glass,
> then forget about it. Blame copyright law[1], not me.
Actually I was thinking of Ferneyhough, but ... :-P
Anyway, exactly the answer I was expecting. Not a problem -- will just
have to be inventive with examples. Thanks for the explanation.
I'll get on with more work/patches (hopefully without DOS
line-endings...) and we'll see where this goes ...
> Oh, and make sure you vote for your country's Pirate Party.
> Branches started recently in the UK and Canada, so I've got my
> next elections' votes lined up. ;)
:-)
Best wishes,
-- Joe
- Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/03
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/03
- Re: Contemporary music documentation,
Joseph Wakeling <=
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/06
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/11