[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Contemporary music documentation
|
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: Contemporary music documentation |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:37:37 +0200 |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Those are extremely good points. In the interests of a full
> discussion (on a separate mailist, to avoid cluttering -devel),
May I suggest http://lists.lilynet.net/proposals/ ?
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, (continued)
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/06
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/11
- Re: Contemporary music documentation,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/13
Re: Contemporary music documentation, Valentin Villenave, 2009/09/04
Re: Contemporary music documentation, Mark Polesky, 2009/09/04