Re: Treating a tie as a slur

[Valentin Villenave]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Lilypond would see if that were the case.

What, are you implying that LilyPond should decide that

#1:
a~ b

...means a slur

BUT

#2:
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
a~ b c d | e1 | a,

...means a tie

BUT

#3:
a~ b c d
[insert 42 measures here without an a]
a

...doesn't actually mean a tie, but should be treated as a slur instead?

This seems haphazard to me. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment?

Cheers,
Valentin.